How Does Minnesota Define Sexual Consent?
In Minnesota, sexual consent is defined as a clear, voluntary, and affirmative agreement to engage in sexual activity. This means that both parties must freely and actively agree to the activity without any coercion, intimidation, or pressure.
Key points to remember:
- Consent is ongoing: Consent can be withdrawn at any time, even during the act.
- Silence does not imply consent: If someone does not actively agree, it does not mean they have consented.
- Capacity to consent: A person must have the mental capacity to understand and make decisions about sexual activity.
There are grave consequences when you’ve been arrested and convicted for sex crimes in Minnesota. In addition to the hit to your reputation, a conviction for sex-related offenses could also bring about lengthy prison terms or costly fines. Dealing with the challenges of a sex crime arrest—even if the accusations are baseless—can be devastating.
Central to most sex offenses is the concept of consent. A sexual act becomes criminal when one of the parties involved does not consent to it. In general, it involves willfully agreeing to take part in the interaction.
If you were charged with a sex offense in Minnesota, the issue of consent could be an important part of your defense strategy. If you believe the other party consented to the encounter, it could be the focus. Get in touch with the attorneys of Gerald Miller to discuss your options moving forward.
How is Consent Defined by Minnesota Statute?
The concept of consensual sexual contact is relatively clear-cut, as it refers to a person’s affirmative agreement to participate in sexual activity. For purposes of criminal law, Minnesota statutes provide a very specific definition.
Definition of Consent Under MN Law
The important points of Minnesota Statutes Section 609.341 are:
- Consent refers to words or overt actions.
- The person acting must indicate agreement to engage in a certain act with the other individual, and their permission to engage in the conduct is freely given.
- The existence of a prior or significant relationship between two actors does not have any bearing on consent.
- A complainant’s failure to resist sexual contact does not constitute consent.
- Consent to acts of a sexual nature does not equal agreement to sexual penetration.
- A person who lacks mental capacity or is physically helpless as defined by this section cannot consent to a sexual act.
Proving Consent
The statute also addresses what is required to establish the lack of consent in a criminal trial. Some US states require some form of corroboration to prove a lack of consent. However, Minnesota law makes clear corroborating testimony is not necessary to establish the lack of consent in a criminal trial.
There can be specific scenarios involving silence and consent. A person’s silence does not mean that they do not object to the encounter. At the same time, silence does not necessarily equal consent either. When considering facts regarding of consent, an individual can pursue criminal charges related to a sexual assault even if they did not physically resist at the time.
Facts and evidence about consent can lead to numerous challenges during the criminal process. In many cases, both the accused and the reporting witness will vigorously disagree about consent. The attorneys of Gerald Miller could make the case for consent when interviewing witnesses during trial or while pursuing a motion to dismiss.
Withdrawal of Consent
Some people assume that consent to a sexual act is a yes or no proposition. In reality, it is an ongoing agreement that must last the length of a sexual encounter. That is why the statute makes it clear that consent is not only a freely given agreement to take part in a sexual encounter, but the agreement must be present as well.
In other words, it’s possible for any party to a sexual encounter to withdraw their consent at any point. It’s not a critical fact if the encounter was initially consensual because consent can be withdrawn without warning or conditions.
When Consent is not a Defense
Keep in mind that consent forms the basis of an effective defense to many allegations of sexual assault, but there are times when the presence of consent does not act as a defense. Minnesota law deems certain individuals unable to consent to sexual contact.
Some of the cases where consent cannot be freely given include:
- Minors below the age of consent under statutory rape laws
- Sexual acts perpetrated by correctional officers, clergy, or therapists
- Alleged victims physically unable to resist
- Alleged victims mentally unable to consent
The central question in these scenarios is whether or not a reporting witness has the power to consent at all. If the individual is unable to consent, a judge will not consider consent as a defense.
The ability to consent is a core issue in sex crimes cases involving minors under Minnesota’s statutory rape statute. Individuals under the age of 18 possess a lack of mental capacity in the eyes of the law, so they cannot consent to sexual encounters. Despite a minor freely engaging in consensual sex, their partner could still face statutory rape charges.
The same is true for adults who lack the mental capacity to make these decisions. Adults who are physically unable to resist—including those too intoxicated to object to a sexual encounter—also qualify.
Another situation regarding the legal ability to consent is cases regarding sexual acts committed by an individual in a current or recent position of power. In the case of law enforcement officers, a person in custody might feel they have little choice but to agree to the sex act proposed by the officer.
Defenses to Sex Offense Charges when Consent is Not Present in Minneapolis
In some cases, a solid defense may apply even when a defendant acknowledges that the standard definition of consent has not been met. While these defenses are rarely applicable, it is important to understand them in case they apply to your situation.
Also, under state law, there are some exceptions. To learn whether these defenses might be available in your case, it is vital that you seek out legal counsel.
Our team at Gerald Miller knows the circumstances where defenses to sex crimes might apply. From evaluating the facts of your case to advising you on what the law holds, we are prepared to assist you in your defense every step of the way. Reach out today to learn more about your options.
Romeo and Juliet Laws
Age of consent laws have very specific application for younger individuals, recognizing that minors can be sexually active. Minnesota has adopted something known as a “Romeo and Juliet” law that applies statutory rape penalties differently depending on age differences and prior romantic relationships.
The age of consent is 16 in Minnesota under certain, specific circumstances. Minors 16 and 17 years old do not have free range to have a sexual relationship with any adult. For these individuals, consent is not a defense for anyone in a position of authority over the minor. For example, a sexual encounter between a 15-year-old and a 16-year-old is not a crime. The same is not true of an adult that is 18 or older and a teenager.
For those aged 13 to 15 years, this defense is only viable for individuals within 24 months of their age.
A person under 13 years old cannot consent to a sexual encounter with an individual, unless they are within 36 months of age 13. Someone could face charges for first degree criminal sexual conduct for having sexual contact with a child under 13 years old.
Marriage
Another rule applies between spouses related to the age of consent. Under certain circumstances, the law allows individuals to marry that would fall outside of the exemptions provided in Romeo and Juliet laws.
It is important to note that this defense does not apply in cases where the couple were living apart or separated.
Mistake of Age
A common allegation by those facing sex crimes charges is that they operated under a mistake of age. In certain cases, a mistake of age could be grounds for a defense. In order for this defense to be valid, four elements must be present:
- The minor is at least 13 but younger than 16
- The defendant believed the child was older than 16
- The defendant’s belief was reasonable, and
- The defendant is no more than 10 years the minor’s elder
Discuss Your Criminal Charges with Gerald Miller Today in Minneapolis
This overview provides an answer to an important question: How does Minnesota define sexual consent? At Gerald Miller, P.A., we understand the stress and uncertainty that comes with criminal sexual conduct charges. Our experienced legal team is dedicated to providing personalized guidance and aggressive representation.
Don’t let legal challenges define your future. Please contact us to schedule a free consultation online today and let us help you find the best possible resolution. We’re here to listen, understand your unique situation, and fight for your rights.
Related Content: Can a Civil Case Lead to Criminal Charges in Minnesota?
