Available 24/7/365 Seattle

Case Results

in Minnesota

Make The Proven Choice And Let Us help You Now

Free Case Evaluation

50+Years Of Collective Experience

10,000Cases Successfully Resolved

100%Criminal & DWI Defense

175+Five Star Google/BBB Reviews

State V. A.D.

County: Hennepin
Original Charge: (F) 2nd Degree Burglary, Felony Theft
Test Result: None
Priors: None
Final Disposition: STAY OF IMPOSITION* on 2nd Degree Burglary, Felony Theft Dismissed

Sentence Imposed:

This was a very serious charge, carrying a very serious term of jail for the client if convicted. Our attorneys were able to negotiate for a Stay of Imposition, and avoid any significant jail time on behalf of the Client. The client was sentenced to only 90 days of executed jail, and was ordered to pay Restitution.
* If a Stay of Imposition is granted, the imposition (or pronouncement) of a prison sentence is delayed to some future date, provided that until that date the offender comply with conditions established by the court. If the offender does comply with those conditions until that date, the case is discharged, and for civil purposes (employment applications, etc.) the offender has a record of a misdemeanor rather than a felony conviction.

(Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission)

State V. A.S.

County: Washington (StillwateR)
Original Charge: (GM) 3rd Degree DWI (Minor Child in the Vehicle)
Test Result: 12
Priors: None
Final Disposition: 12

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to secure a sentence which included no executed jail, and a $300.00 Fine.

State V. A.T.

County: Scott
Original Charge: (GM) 2nd Degree DWI (3 Minor Children in the Vehicle)
Test Result: 057
Priors: 2
Final Disposition: (PM) Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to negotiate the Client’s Gross Misdemeanor charge down to a Petty Misdemeanor, which does not carry any jail time or probation. The client was only required to pay a $100.00 Fine.

State V. D.B.

County: Anoka
Original Charge: (F) 1st Degree DWI + 2 (F) DWI Probation Violations
Test Result: REFUSAL
Priors: 6 (Lifetime, incl. two Felony DWIs)
Final Disposition: (F) 1st Degree DWI + 2 PV Admissions

Sentence Imposed:

Despite this new Felony DWI conviction, which called for a mandatory 36 month prison sentence, and at the same time also caused probation violations on two prior felony DWIs where 41 and 42 months of prison time were previously stayed, we were able (over the prosecutor and probation department’s objections) to negotiate for the client to serve ONLY 90 days of local, in custody time (minus 1/3 credit for good time + 3 days already served) and pay a fine of only $300.00.

State V. D.E.

County: Dakota (Farmington)
Original Charge: (GM) Interference w/ 911 Call + (M) Domestic Assault
Test Result: N/A
Priors: N/A
Final Disposition: STAY OF ADJUDICATION* on (M) Domestic Assault

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to secure a stay of adjudication for 1 year, sentence which included no additional executed jail, 3 days of Sentence to Service, and only a $300.00 Fine.

* Stay of Adjudication: a Defendant pleads guilty to an offense. However, the Judge does not “accept” the guilty plea. Rather, you get a Sentence of a “Stay of Adjudication.”
A conviction for an offense is not entered on your criminal record, provided you successfully complete probation. Once you do, the charges are dismissed, and your criminal record is clear of any convictions.

State V. D.R.

County: Carver
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI + Speed + Illegal Window Tint
Test Result: .07
Priors: None
Final Disposition: (M) Speed

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to negotiate for a plea to a non-alcohol related offense, and a sentence which included no additional executed jail, and only a $500.00 Fine.

State V. D.S.

County: Hennepin (Brooklyn Park)
Original Charge: (GM) 3rd Degree DWI
Test Result: .11
Priors: 1
Final Disposition: (M) Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to negotiate this Gross Misdemeanor charge down to a misdemeanor, carrying a maximum penalty of 90 days in jail. We were able to keep the client from serving any additional jail time, and the client was only ordered to pay a $300.00 Fine.

State V. D.T.

County: St. Louis (Ely)
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI
Test Result: .09
Priors: None
Final Disposition: (M) Obstruct Legal Process

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to negotiate for a plea to a non-alcohol related offense, and a sentence which included no additional executed jail, and only a $300.00 Fine.

State V. J.A.

County: Hennepin (Edina)
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI (Narcotics)
Test Result: N/A
Priors: None
Final Disposition: (M) Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to secure a sentence which included no additional executed jail, and only a $300.00 Fine.

State V. J.B.

County: Insanti
Original Charge: (F) Felony in Possession of a Firearm
Test Result: N/A
Priors: None
Final Disposition: DISMISSED

Sentence Imposed:

We filed a successful motion to DISMISS on the grounds that the client’s constitutional rights had been violated, and his right to possess a firearm had been restored previously. The prosecutor dismissed the case entirely. NO SENTENCE IMPOSED.

State V. J.C.

County: Hennepin (Minneapolis)
Original Charge: 5th Degree Assault
Test Result: N/A
Priors: None
Final Disposition: (M) Disorderly Conduct

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to secure a sentence which included no additional executed jail, only 5 days of Sentence to Service, and no Fines.

State V. J.H.

County: Dakota (Inver Grove Heights)
Original Charge: (GM) 4th Degree Assault
Test Result: N/A
Priors: N/A
Final Disposition: (M) Disorderly Conduct

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to negotiate the Client’s Gross Misdemeanor charge down to a Misdemeanor, with a sentence that included no additional executed jail and only a $300.00 Fine.

State V. J.J.

County: Anoka
Original Charge: 2nd Degree SWI (Snowmobiling While Intoxicated)
Test Result: .18
Priors: 2
Final Disposition: 3rd Degree SWI

Sentence Imposed:

the Client’s snowmobile, valued at approximately $10,000 was forfeited as a result of this charge. We were able to negotiate a buyback of the forfeited snowmobile for only $2,250.00. We were also able to negotiate all 28 days of the custody time to be served on Electronic Home Monitoring. $500.00 fine.

State V. J.L.

County: Hennepin
Original Charge: 2nd Degree DWI (Accident w/Injuries)
Test Result: .23
Priors: 5 (Lifetime)
Final Disposition: 2nd Degree DWI

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to successfully negotiate for minimal time in custody on behalf of the client. Client was sentenced to only 2 Days executed Jail; with the remaining 28 Days on Electronic Home Monitoring and a $900.00 Fine.

State V. J.O.

County: Anoka (Spring Lake Park)
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI
Test Result: .07
Priors: None
Final Disposition: (PM) Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to negotiate the Client’s Misdemeanor charge down to a Petty Misdemeanor, which does not carry any jail time or probation. The client was only required to pay a $300.00 Fine.

State V. J.T.

County: Anoka (Blaine)
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI
Test Result: .13
Priors: Charged once, but not convicted
Final Disposition: (M) Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

Sentence Imposed: We were able to secure a sentence which included no additional executed jail, and only a $300.00 Fine.

State V. J.Z.

County: Anoka
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI + Driving After Revocation (DAR) + Posession of Drug Paraphernalia
Test Result: .13
Priors: None
Final Disposition: DISMISSED

Sentence Imposed:

We successfully challenged the Implied Consent on the grounds that the Officer’s stop of the client’s vehicle violated his constitutional rights, which resulted in RESCISSION of the Clients license revocation. Based on the issues raised at the Implied Consent, we were able to convince the prosecutor to DISMISS the charges completely.

State V. L.P.

County: Washington (Cottage Grove)
Original Charge: 2nd Degree DWI
Test Result: REFUSAL
Priors: 1
Final Disposition: STAY OF ADJUDICATION* on 3rd Degree DWI + (M) Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

We successfully challenged the Implied Consent which resulted in the RESCISSION of the Clients license revocation; our attorneys were also able to secure a sentence which included no executed jail and a $500.00 Fine.

* Stay of Adjudication: a Defendant pleads guilty to an offense. However, the Judge does not “accept” the guilty plea. Rather, you get a Sentence of a
Stay of Adjudication.

A conviction for an offense is not entered on your criminal record, provided you successfully complete probation. Once you do, the charges are dismissed, and your criminal record is clear of any convictions.

State V. L.S.

County: Wright
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI
Test Result: .10
Priors: None
Final Disposition: Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

We successfully challenged the Implied Consent which resulted in the RESCISSION of the Clients license revocation; the Client was sentenced to 40 Hours Community Work Service, and a $300.00 Fine

 

Current/Past Awards & Recognitions

Minnesota's Best Criminal Defense and DWI Lawyers in Minneapolis

Attorney Kyle Dreger /

Kyle Dreger

Criminal Defense & DWI Lawyer
Team gerald miller

Gerald Miller

Criminal Defense & DWI Attorney

Why Trust Gerald Miller Law Firm

Free Consultation

Acting quickly will minimize the impact. Don’t wait Now!








    Because

    • We offer you a FREE, no obligation initial consultation.
    • Our team is available to you 24/7/365. You can contact us at anytime of day or night and we will be there to help you.
    • Not all attorneys are the same.• We only practice criminal law. We are able to intensely focus on your criminal case.• We have decades of experience and have represented thousands of clients. We have the knowledge and skill to give you the representation you need in your case. Our seasoned team comprises Minneapolis assault lawyers, fraud lawyers, Minneapolis sex crimes lawyers, and many more. If you have a legal issue, we will resolve it.• We will work passionately and tirelessly on your individual case. We understand that each case is uniquely different and we promise to tailor our approach to your individual needs. So, whether you hire our Minneapolis assault attorney or Minneapolis drug crimes attorney, We will fight hard for you and be by your side every step of the way.• We understand the severity of a criminal case in your life. We will not only match that level of gravity during your representation, rather we will exceed it.• We promise to treat your personal case with compassion and respect every step of the way. We understand that you may have fears, concerns and questions. We will listen to you and put ourselves in your shoes so that we are able to give you the best and most individualized representation possible.• We are a team. Are resources are deep and strong. We collaborate and continually draw from each other’s experience to devise the best strategy and defense for you.

    How We Make A Difference For You

    See What Our Clients Say

    Kyle Hawes
    Kyle Hawes
    06:44 03 Dec 23
    Ever seen the movie devil's advocate? Well Brodie Haken is more powerful than God! He owns the courtroom,he's a absolute pitbull dog in the fight! He takes case on as if he was being charged instead of you. Minnesota and twin cities finest attorney 15 thousand best money one can ever spend. If you want real ethical but aggressive legal representation call Brodie he's a actual trial lawyer not some DUI lightweight playing big shot but has no trial experience except DUI a intelligent 3rd grader could handle that level of offense and Kyle is a DUI guy but Gerald Miller law Gerry is a legend In the legal realm he's got the experience to know what to do in the most dire situations I was looking at 54 years prison but I didn't even worry knowing these guys are on my side.Gerry is admired by his Peers and judges...
    maddy koss
    maddy koss
    20:20 01 Dec 23
    Nima Adan
    Nima Adan
    17:20 27 Nov 23
    I appreciate all the hard work they do , nothing but the best
    Paul Voelker
    Paul Voelker
    13:05 17 Nov 23
    Kyle Dreger was hands on from the moment I reached out to the firm and asked for help in my case. Kyle was an absolute pleasure to work with and was always available no matter the date or time, truly worked above and beyond my expectations and I would recommend Kyle and the firm to anyone.
    Nisha Thomas
    Nisha Thomas
    03:04 04 Nov 23
    My boyfriend has been working with Gerald Miller, specifically Kyle Dreger, as the lead lawyer for his cases.My boyfriend has multiples cases happening simultaneously. The entire team has been extremely helpful and responsive. Not only have they worked with my boyfriend but they have continued to work with his family and loved ones to make sure that our case is handled properly and in a timely manner. I would highly recommend anyone seeking legal advice to reach out to Gerald Miller and specifically ask for Kyle because we believe he’ll provide the best possible advice and support for your case.
    Tristen Kurtzweg
    Tristen Kurtzweg
    00:29 18 Oct 23
    Got screwed from another lawyer in my past. Gerald Miller P.A. was a great decision as they kept my interest over theirs. I was able to set aside my worries and continue to live my life while they worked. Great group and would definitely return if needed. Highly recommend.

    See More Testimonials

    Keeping You Informed

    Latest Blog Posts

    Minneapolis Drug Crime Attorney: Fighting Marijuana Charges in Court

    If you are facing drug possession charges in Minneapolis, it is crucial to understand the available defense strategies to protect your rights and secure the best possible outcome for your case. From c...

    READ MORE >

    Kyle Dreger | August 25th, 2023

    Understanding Marijuana Laws in Minnesota: Tips from a Minneapolis Defense Attorney

    The legalization of recreational marijuana in Minnesota has cannabis users feeling good. However, these Marijuana laws have left it unclear as to when full legalization applies and when legal dispensa...

    READ MORE >

    Gerald Miller | August 20th, 2023

    A Woodbury DWI Attorney Explains the Consequences when Children are Involved

    Many drivers who are ultimately arrested under suspicion of driving while impaired (DWI) only get behind the wheel because they are confident they are clear-headed enough to drive safely. For many of ...

    READ MORE >

    GWSEOSupport | August 16th, 2023
     

    Get A Free Consultation

    Acting quickly will minimize the impact. Don’t wait act now!