Available 24/7/365 Denver
Select Language: English Spanish
Select Language: English Spanish

Case Results

in Minnesota

Make The Proven Choice And Let Us help You Now

Free Case Evaluation

50+

Years Of Collective Experience

10,000

Cases Successfully Resolved

100%

Criminal & DWI Defense

175+

Five Star Google/BBB Reviews

State V. A.D.

County: Hennepin
Original Charge: (F) 2nd Degree Burglary, Felony Theft
Test Result: None
Priors: None
Final Disposition: STAY OF IMPOSITION* on 2nd Degree Burglary, Felony Theft Dismissed

Sentence Imposed:

This was a very serious charge, carrying a very serious term of jail for the client if convicted. Our attorneys were able to negotiate for a Stay of Imposition, and avoid any significant jail time on behalf of the Client. The client was sentenced to only 90 days of executed jail, and was ordered to pay Restitution.
* If a Stay of Imposition is granted, the imposition (or pronouncement) of a prison sentence is delayed to some future date, provided that until that date the offender comply with conditions established by the court. If the offender does comply with those conditions until that date, the case is discharged, and for civil purposes (employment applications, etc.) the offender has a record of a misdemeanor rather than a felony conviction.

(Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission)

State V. A.S.

County: Washington (StillwateR)
Original Charge: (GM) 3rd Degree DWI (Minor Child in the Vehicle)
Test Result: 12
Priors: None
Final Disposition: 12

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to secure a sentence which included no executed jail, and a $300.00 Fine.

State V. A.T.

County: Scott
Original Charge: (GM) 2nd Degree DWI (3 Minor Children in the Vehicle)
Test Result: 057
Priors: 2
Final Disposition: (PM) Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to negotiate the Client’s Gross Misdemeanor charge down to a Petty Misdemeanor, which does not carry any jail time or probation. The client was only required to pay a $100.00 Fine.

State V. D.B.

County: Anoka
Original Charge: (F) 1st Degree DWI + 2 (F) DWI Probation Violations
Test Result: REFUSAL
Priors: 6 (Lifetime, incl. two Felony DWIs)
Final Disposition: (F) 1st Degree DWI + 2 PV Admissions

Sentence Imposed:

Despite this new Felony DWI conviction, which called for a mandatory 36 month prison sentence, and at the same time also caused probation violations on two prior felony DWIs where 41 and 42 months of prison time were previously stayed, we were able (over the prosecutor and probation department’s objections) to negotiate for the client to serve ONLY 90 days of local, in custody time (minus 1/3 credit for good time + 3 days already served) and pay a fine of only $300.00.

State V. D.E.

County: Dakota (Farmington)
Original Charge: (GM) Interference w/ 911 Call + (M) Domestic Assault
Test Result: N/A
Priors: N/A
Final Disposition: STAY OF ADJUDICATION* on (M) Domestic Assault

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to secure a stay of adjudication for 1 year, sentence which included no additional executed jail, 3 days of Sentence to Service, and only a $300.00 Fine.

* Stay of Adjudication: a Defendant pleads guilty to an offense. However, the Judge does not “accept” the guilty plea. Rather, you get a Sentence of a “Stay of Adjudication.”
A conviction for an offense is not entered on your criminal record, provided you successfully complete probation. Once you do, the charges are dismissed, and your criminal record is clear of any convictions.

State V. D.R.

County: Carver
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI + Speed + Illegal Window Tint
Test Result: .07
Priors: None
Final Disposition: (M) Speed

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to negotiate for a plea to a non-alcohol related offense, and a sentence which included no additional executed jail, and only a $500.00 Fine.

State V. D.S.

County: Hennepin (Brooklyn Park)
Original Charge: (GM) 3rd Degree DWI
Test Result: .11
Priors: 1
Final Disposition: (M) Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to negotiate this Gross Misdemeanor charge down to a misdemeanor, carrying a maximum penalty of 90 days in jail. We were able to keep the client from serving any additional jail time, and the client was only ordered to pay a $300.00 Fine.

State V. D.T.

County: St. Louis (Ely)
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI
Test Result: .09
Priors: None
Final Disposition: (M) Obstruct Legal Process

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to negotiate for a plea to a non-alcohol related offense, and a sentence which included no additional executed jail, and only a $300.00 Fine.

State V. J.A.

County: Hennepin (Edina)
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI (Narcotics)
Test Result: N/A
Priors: None
Final Disposition: (M) Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to secure a sentence which included no additional executed jail, and only a $300.00 Fine.

State V. J.B.

County: Insanti
Original Charge: (F) Felony in Possession of a Firearm
Test Result: N/A
Priors: None
Final Disposition: DISMISSED

Sentence Imposed:

We filed a successful motion to DISMISS on the grounds that the client’s constitutional rights had been violated, and his right to possess a firearm had been restored previously. The prosecutor dismissed the case entirely. NO SENTENCE IMPOSED.

State V. J.C.

County: Hennepin (Minneapolis)
Original Charge: 5th Degree Assault
Test Result: N/A
Priors: None
Final Disposition: (M) Disorderly Conduct

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to secure a sentence which included no additional executed jail, only 5 days of Sentence to Service, and no Fines.

State V. J.H.

County: Dakota (Inver Grove Heights)
Original Charge: (GM) 4th Degree Assault
Test Result: N/A
Priors: N/A
Final Disposition: (M) Disorderly Conduct

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to negotiate the Client’s Gross Misdemeanor charge down to a Misdemeanor, with a sentence that included no additional executed jail and only a $300.00 Fine.

State V. J.J.

County: Anoka
Original Charge: 2nd Degree SWI (Snowmobiling While Intoxicated)
Test Result: .18
Priors: 2
Final Disposition: 3rd Degree SWI

Sentence Imposed:

the Client’s snowmobile, valued at approximately $10,000 was forfeited as a result of this charge. We were able to negotiate a buyback of the forfeited snowmobile for only $2,250.00. We were also able to negotiate all 28 days of the custody time to be served on Electronic Home Monitoring. $500.00 fine.

State V. J.L.

County: Hennepin
Original Charge: 2nd Degree DWI (Accident w/Injuries)
Test Result: .23
Priors: 5 (Lifetime)
Final Disposition: 2nd Degree DWI

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to successfully negotiate for minimal time in custody on behalf of the client. Client was sentenced to only 2 Days executed Jail; with the remaining 28 Days on Electronic Home Monitoring and a $900.00 Fine.

State V. J.O.

County: Anoka (Spring Lake Park)
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI
Test Result: .07
Priors: None
Final Disposition: (PM) Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

We were able to negotiate the Client’s Misdemeanor charge down to a Petty Misdemeanor, which does not carry any jail time or probation. The client was only required to pay a $300.00 Fine.

State V. J.T.

County: Anoka (Blaine)
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI
Test Result: .13
Priors: Charged once, but not convicted
Final Disposition: (M) Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

Sentence Imposed: We were able to secure a sentence which included no additional executed jail, and only a $300.00 Fine.

State V. J.Z.

County: Anoka
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI + Driving After Revocation (DAR) + Posession of Drug Paraphernalia
Test Result: .13
Priors: None
Final Disposition: DISMISSED

Sentence Imposed:

We successfully challenged the Implied Consent on the grounds that the Officer’s stop of the client’s vehicle violated his constitutional rights, which resulted in RESCISSION of the Clients license revocation. Based on the issues raised at the Implied Consent, we were able to convince the prosecutor to DISMISS the charges completely.

State V. L.P.

County: Washington (Cottage Grove)
Original Charge: 2nd Degree DWI
Test Result: REFUSAL
Priors: 1
Final Disposition: STAY OF ADJUDICATION* on 3rd Degree DWI + (M) Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

We successfully challenged the Implied Consent which resulted in the RESCISSION of the Clients license revocation; our attorneys were also able to secure a sentence which included no executed jail and a $500.00 Fine.

* Stay of Adjudication: a Defendant pleads guilty to an offense. However, the Judge does not “accept” the guilty plea. Rather, you get a Sentence of a
Stay of Adjudication.

A conviction for an offense is not entered on your criminal record, provided you successfully complete probation. Once you do, the charges are dismissed, and your criminal record is clear of any convictions.

State V. L.S.

County: Wright
Original Charge: 4th Degree DWI
Test Result: .10
Priors: None
Final Disposition: Careless Driving

Sentence Imposed:

We successfully challenged the Implied Consent which resulted in the RESCISSION of the Clients license revocation; the Client was sentenced to 40 Hours Community Work Service, and a $300.00 Fine

 

Current/Past Awards & Recognitions

Four Attorneys One Powerful Law Firm

Minnesota's Best Criminal Defense and DWI Lawyers in Minneapolis

Attorney Kyle Dreger /

Kyle Dreger

Criminal Defense & DWI Lawyer
Team gerald miller

Gerald Miller

Criminal Defense & DWI Attorney
Attorney Cody Wright

Cody Wright

Criminal Defense & DWI Lawyer
Ronnie Santana

Ronnie Santana

Criminal Defense & DWI Attorney

Why Trust Gerald Miller Law Firm

Free Consultation

Acting quickly will minimize the impact. Don’t wait Now!








    Because

    • We offer you a FREE, no obligation initial consultation.
    • Our team is available to you 24/7/365. You can contact us at anytime of day or night and we will be there to help you.
    • Not all attorneys are the same.

      • We only practice criminal law. We are able to intensely focus on your criminal case.• We have decades of experience and have represented thousands of clients. We have the knowledge and skill to give you the representation you need in your case. Our seasoned team comprises Minneapolis assault lawyers, fraud lawyers, Minneapolis sex crimes lawyers, and many more. If you have a legal issue, we will resolve it.

      • We will work passionately and tirelessly on your individual case. We understand that each case is uniquely different and we promise to tailor our approach to your individual needs. So, whether you hire our Minneapolis assault attorney or Minneapolis drug crimes attorney, We will fight hard for you and be by your side every step of the way.

      • We understand the severity of a criminal case in your life. We will not only match that level of gravity during your representation, rather we will exceed it.

      • We promise to treat your personal case with compassion and respect every step of the way. We understand that you may have fears, concerns and questions. We will listen to you and put ourselves in your shoes so that we are able to give you the best and most individualized representation possible.

      • We are a team. Are resources are deep and strong. We collaborate and continually draw from each other’s experience to devise the best strategy and defense for you.

    How We Make A Difference For You

    See What Our Clients Say

    emma ishol
    emma ishol
    14:17 10 Sep 22
    Derek Dahlstrom
    Derek Dahlstrom
    00:39 10 Sep 22
    David Phillips
    David Phillips
    22:29 09 Sep 22
    Kyle Dreger represented me for what could have been a life destroying charge. He was an outstanding attorney from the start, easy to communicate with- he ALWAYS answered my texts when I had a question. The outcome was the best it could have been, and I am forever grateful to Kyle and the Gerlad Miller Law Firm for their services. I highly recommend their law firm for any legal case you would need defense for.
    Kyle McCallum
    Kyle McCallum
    14:07 01 Sep 22
    Call this team. I was treated with respect and a level of understanding that I didn’t expect. Even though it was a difficult time for me, Kyle was fantastic in explaining things to a level I could easily understand and responded quickly to any of my concerns along the way. Again - call them.
    Shoua Xiong
    Shoua Xiong
    16:10 26 Aug 22
    When I found out I was getting my DUI in February I was panicking because I've heard nothing good from having it on your record. I honestly planned to just take it and forget about it and live with it but my wife said we should lawyer up and we were up for a few hours that night and came across Gerald Miller Law Firm from googling DUI lawyers. We read so many reviews from other law firms but nothing sounded authentic and content as Gerald Millers Law Firm. We decided to call this firm and Kyle picked up and was briefed about my situation. He was confident, professional, and sympathetic off the bat with our situation. I entrusted Kyle and his firm with the case and I can honestly say that they handled it all very well. I can confidently recommend anyone who is having the same situation to reach out and contact this Gerald Miller law firm for profession help with their case.
    Roger B
    Roger B
    21:51 22 Aug 22
    Strongly recommend. Could not have been happier .

    See More Testimonials

    Keeping You Informed

    Latest Blog Posts

    What Happens When You Get Charged with Domestic Assault in Minneapolis?

    Uncertain what happens when you get charged with domestic assault in Minneapolis? For most people facing these charges, the criminal justice process can be overwhelming. In many cases, an arrest for d...

    READ MORE >

    Kyle Dreger | September 20th, 2022

    How to Get a Possession of Controlled Substance Charge Dismissed in Minnesota?

    The negative impact of a drug possession conviction can last for the rest of your life. In addition to the risk of incarceration, you could also face lasting challenges with finding employment or secu...

    READ MORE >

    Cody Wright | September 15th, 2022

    How to Get a Criminal Vehicle Operation Charge Dismissed in Minneapolis

    A criminal vehicle operation charge is a serious offense under Minneapolis law. These charges are generally raised by the state when a person uses a motor vehicle to cause great bodily harm to someone...

    READ MORE >

    Gerald Miller | September 10th, 2022
     

    Get A Free Consultation

    Acting quickly will minimize the impact. Don’t wait act now!